Just click it. Gotta love Google.
A programmer is told to “go to hell”, he finds the worst part of that statement is the “go to” : ;D
I belong to the third type, programmers who hate multi line comments.
if (condition)
{
statements;
//
// ...
//
}
top kek
Ah, stereotypes… the pinnacle of humor.
[sup]I myself prefer statictypes >.>[/sup]
To be honest that isn’t even legit syntax and is more self explanatory than programmer singular. Should be something more like
if((ComputerKnowledge)(you.getKnowledgeBase()).understands(this))
you.getAttributes().setNeedsSO(true);
It’s 1 am and I still haven’t done 2 essays that are due tomorrow. Got 1 finished as well as some other homework, but I must forge on! Goodnight JGO.
Edit:
C++ makes things even better/worse. It’s a love hate thing okay.
bool (HumanAttribs::*needsSO)(Human*);
needsSO = &HumanAttribs::GetUtils()::CalcNerdiness;
if(needsSO(this))
std::cout << "Please get a life." << std::cout;
Because why not have obfuscated, needlessly complicated code?
I would like to point out that expressing lame “jokes” in code does not make them any funnier.
And being pedantic about the code representation of a lame joke is even less funny.
No offense to anyone.
I was being stupid on purpose if you couldn’t tell :
I know you couldn’t. Sorry.
// Some code
:wq
A file my brother wrote
You reminded me of VIM man, that’s the same thing I did when I was learning :persecutioncomplex: :
There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, those who don’t, those who didn’t expect it to be base 3 joke, and those who realized it can be a base 4 joke.
Seriously though, this joke is so easy to expand.
I’d call it a Peano joke!
… and those that never get first base.
I’ll see myself out, once again :emo:
LOL ;D ;D ;D
An adult asks a child: “What do you want to be when you grow up?”
The child says: “a game programmer!”
To which, the adult responds: “I’m sorry, but you are going to have to choose.”