Not exactly. People are not hiring. Period. There’s a lot of talk that employers have a high demand for skilled workers, but in times of high demand the price people are willing to pay for that thing increases and the quantity of items that they are willing to pay for increase. Employers want people to wear several hats, pay for their own training, have worked for a competitor of theirs, and be willing to work for less pay (for both experienced and inexperienced workers) than new graduates did five years ago. Employers ask that their employees be engineers and secretaries or be software developers and tech support people or astrophysicists and janitor. You could hire both an astrophysicist and a janitor, but they wouldn’t be the same person and you can’t expect the best of both worlds by getting the skilled worker for a less-skilled worker’s salary. It’s unreasonable to expect that unless people become isolated, mutually hostile, and desperate.
They tell people via the media that they want more skilled workers in order to create hype (even retail stores - apparently Americans are either too dumb to count money or are so dumb that they believe that retail stores can’t find sufficiently “skilled” workers). If the market (demand) matched the hype, every new graduate would have full time employment and be rich. The whole unemployment benefits as being harmful thing is also imagined. If the program were allowed to do its job (and not “reformed” as soon as they start to kick in - sort of like shutting off the fan in your computer because it starts spinning faster…) they would act as an automatic stabilizer and prevent a snowball effect from wiping out other jobs by slowing cyclical recession. Although if powers having nothing to do with imaginary things like economic theories continue along current trends, the “recession” is permanent and systemic and America is not capable of recovering skilled jobs even if it has many more skilled un-employees than other countries.