[quote]- given lwjgl and jgo are both relatively low traffic, it’d make sense to merge them together in order to concentrate everything in one place and avoid dispersion. Also this mean, theoretical, lower maintenance… two birds one stone. Apostolos and Spasi seem to agree and share the same point of view
[/quote]
Nice offer and well worth considering!
A consideration: jgo could also be a sort of hub and could refer lwjgl questions to lwjgl? I am thinking along these lines because there are a number of java-based libraries, e.g., jmonkey, jogl, others?
[quote]- @philfrei, why don’t you join us on slack? we could coordinate us faster and easier
[/quote]
Do you have the link? I’ve dropped in a couple times, but don’t have the link handy and my “working memory” for these kind of things is old and creaky.
Slack allows quicker turnaround, but it’s worth considering that this thread is a visible public record. I don’t think that there is a particular need for speed, even if the natural tendency is to experience impatience. If you are going forward with setting up a Discourse version of JGO to test, that would be great! Hopefully I’ll get over the tech hurdle with JForum2 and we can get these both up and running for comparison purposes before too long.
Good news on my end: Ulf Dittmer, the author of JForum2 is being VERY responsive and helpful, has built a Jetty-enabled version which I just downloaded and am trying out. Progress can be seen on this thread.
[quote]I think it would be better to take some working software instead of preffering Java-based forum software.
This forum is about java-gaming and not about java-forums Smiley
I’d prefer to have staable and efficent forum against java-based forum.
[/quote]
I wholly agree with this. But I think it is to soon to say that JForum2 is “not working” or unstable or inefficient. What is lacking is my knowledge and experience with installing servers!!