[quote=“Ecumene,post:1,topic:50883”]
Wall of text to clarify ambiguous terminology, sorry … 
A byte just means a group of 8 bits (binary digits). It isn’t necessarily a number - it’s a good idea to get the two things separate in your mind. Bytes are commonly used for other things as well as representing numbers. E.g. as well as the numbers from 0 to 255 a byte might hold 256 unique combos of bits for 256 distinct enemy types, or the 8 bits can be used individually for 8 boolean (i.e. true or false) flags.
Just like decimal digits need not represent numbers. E.g. a group of 4 like “1234” could be a ATM code, or a group of 6 like “555123” a local phone.
So in answer to your literal question, no you can’t really write a byte without leading zeros because a byte actually means 8 bits. If you wrote 4 it would be a “nybble” (terrible word!) But to answer the question you may have meant, see BurntPizza above. Leading zeros are not meaningful when writing a number in any base for a human to read.
I can remember when I was taught binary it took me a while to separate the two subjects in my head of
(a) binary numbers in general as a math concept, and
(b) how computers use their little chunks of bits and bytes to perform binary arithmetic.
I guess it’s natural to teach them together because binary math isn’t used anywhere else except in computers, but I remember finding it confusing for a while till I got it clear they are distinct.
[quote=""]
So to be clear, talking of twos-complement is part of subject (b) … i.e. it’s how a computer represents negative numbers using only "1"s and "0"s. In human written language … i.e. subject (a) … something like “minus 15”, i.e decimal -15 would be written in binary as -1111. When the class looks into subject (b) in more detail they’ll come across not only twos-complement as a way of representing negatives, but the beauties of endianism too. I envy you, lucky students ;D