I just saw a commercial for it, and while it seems all good an fine I see one major hole in it. I really hope there is a way to come around this, but that would be figthing the purpose.
The whole OS is a browser. That’s fine, but what about software? As said in the commercial: You can do everything on the web. That’s only partially true! You don’t find Photosop running somewhere in Flash or Java, do you? Or Sony Vegas? Or 3Ds Max? Or even MS Word? Well, maybe there is some applet-writer that supports the Word-format, but that’s probably the top. What about all the good software?
I’m aware of some photo-editing software that runs in Flash, but I really doubt it is that advanced. Java, Flash, and Silverlight is the most advanced technoligies right now for the browser, and nobody uses that to power really advanced and expensive software.
- They would get a myriad of connections downloading HUGE files every time someone visits.
- Costumers can’t work offline.
Chromebook promises no virusses. That means no download aswell to me. Java applets need to download the classes and resources everytime they load right? That’s why most people use a cache, but that’ll be impossible with Chromebooks because of no downloading?
No matter what, this is just protecting the user a little more. We still need servers, and harddisks in them. And they’ll be open for the world to attack and what-not. Not saying they’re to a bigger risk though.
What have I overlooked about this “great” idea?