Yeah, that’d be fine - afaik - as long as credit is placed where it is due - then everything should be fine!
/me goes off to investigate al4Java’s performance ;D
I’ve made the necessary changes in the source code. I can’t seem to log in to the sourceforge cvs server for the moment, so those changes will have to wait a little bit longer.
I’ve been working on a rewrite from scratch of the two affected c files to avoid any further license troubles.
On the performance question, al4java will probably be slower than the lwjgl implementation. I’ve used GetPrimitiveArrayCritical, which should avoid copying as much as possible, but this is not guaranteed. However, I prefer that overhead over exposing pointers. I could probably add nio support to the code to get more or less the same results as the lwjgl version, but first I’m going to finish my rewrite 
Just a quick note to let you guys know I finished a ‘clean’ version of al4java. The two c files have been rewritten from scratch, so no more saying I stole your code 
[quote]so no more saying I stole your code
[/quote]
No one ever said anything about stealing the code!
The problem was that you claimed that you have written it!
What baffles me, is that you rewrote it ??? - I would just have slapped on a license and get on with my life… Oh well - not my time used 8)
On a totally unrelated note - “Tree Branches for Mozilla 1.4” woot