LWJGL 0.95 Released

OpenGL Development
#1

(cross post from LWJGL forum)

Time for yet another release - steadily approaching 1.0!
Changes:

  • EAX removed (was win32 specific)
  • Controller removed (only worked on win32, will return later in some other form)
  • LOTS of bug fixes
  • Move and rename of Pbuffer.getCapabilities() and Cursor.getCapabilities()
  • Support for EXT_framebuffer_object (missing driver support)
  • DevIL support now includes ILU/T (still in progress)

Get it here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=58488&package_id=54362&release_id=299852

#2

Controller removed

:-/

#3

wow, you guys are amazing, lwjgl development is moving fast, all i can say is THANKS,

p.s. is there DEVIL support for linux in this release?

#4

Dang. Whats the current plans for some kind of replacement?

Equally, is there any chance of an EAX-like stuff making its way back in (does it even exist on other platforms?).

#5

[quote]p.s. is there DEVIL support for linux in this release?
[/quote]
Sorry, no - I am not sure why there isn’t (cept there is no makefile for it) - it should theoretically work… I think…

#6

[quote]Dang. Whats the current plans for some kind of replacement?
[/quote]
We have talked about using jinput with a java api wrapper (since their current api blows) - but nothing specific.

[quote]Equally, is there any chance of an EAX-like stuff making its way back in (does it even exist on other platforms?).
[/quote]
We have talked about doing “addons” - so a lwjgl-eax.dll might be possible in the future, but that all depends on how much people whine

#7

Eww…

As much as I can appreciate the idea of not duplicating work, using JInput would be a horrible solution. As well as having a rubbish interface, it’s unreliable and has a hideous plug-in system that leaves files messily all over the place for no good reason.

#8

At the very least, we should re-use the (native) plugins themselves, since they’re the most time-consuming part of input. The rest is just platform independent java glue, and shouldn’t take long.

  • elias
#9

What is “controller removed” mean? I have only used mouse and keyboard for input.

#10

Joysticks, Gamepads and so forth - the Controller.java file

#11

Hi,

does 0.95 support fmod for Mac? The mac dist doesn’t contain a native lib for fmod: lwjgl-fmod3.jnilib or something else.

Thanks

#12

At the moment no. I have not been doing anything to the fmod port, since I am expecting aNt to release another fmod port - and I am waiting to see what shape it’s in. Been waiting for some time now though…

#13

ok then I’ll try to fall back to my java sound implementation for mac until there’s mac support.

hum is it possible to use fmod in software?

thanks