Hello,
I read yesterday the whole documentation of the SGS API, and I realized that it is pretty cool and simple to use. I also noticed that the presentation of the data to the user is pretty low level (…send(…, byte[])).
The reason why I started JNAG was because I wanted the programmers to be able to use a RMI-like syntax to identify the remote object and call their functions. My goal was a good presentation layer and I think I succeded this goal.
The reason why I stoped the development of JNAG is because there was at the same time another library that was performing better for the communication layer (… that is a part of what SGS is doing) and programmers had more consent about having a good runtime speed and a lot of low level features than having a nice and easy to use presentation layer.
Now SGS is there, robust, efficient, maintained by a really good team, and I think that it is the missing piece of what I wanted with JNAG and that I couldn’t implement by myself. So I am happy to announce that I am starting to re-think JNAG to adapt it to the top of SGS.
[Edit: Link to JNAG : https://jnag.dev.java.net/]
Vincent Cantin, karmaGfa