Gibbo, mine is a laptop.
Windows 8.1
AMD Radeon HD 8250
4.2.12422 Compatibility Profile Context 13.152.1.3000
ATI Technologies Inc.
Laptop, BTW.
Seriously, stop now. I’ve just provided a log file with over 50 thousand distinct entries in it. Now move along.
Cas 
Woo same gen GPU as me 
Windows 8.1 <-- Windows 10 actually
AMD Radeon HD 5700 Series
4.4.13283 Compatibility Profile Context 14.501.1003.0
ATI Technologies Inc.
/thread.
Thank you so much, this is very useful data. If I have any questions, I will PM you.
As Riven said, this isn’t really needed. However, if you need this kinda of data, look no further:
http://i.imgur.com/zcWozKC.png?1
Click image for source
Just a note about the Steam data - it’s now 2 years out of data; things have changed significantly since then.
Cas
Windows XP
GeForce 9600 GT/PCIe/SSE2
3.3.0
NVIDIA Corporation
^^
I also have Win 7 for some not support software in XP but mainly use XP =)
I reject the premise of that question.
The GPU names on my benchmark site are from GL11.glGetString(GL11.GL_RENDERER):
http://www.headline-benchmark.com/gpu-list/x/
What drives me absolutely nuts is AMD’s naming scheme: “AMD Radeon R9 200 Series” could be a 280, 285, 280X, 290, 290X… It makes my AMD results basically useless.
To be honest the data is, in fact, useless. I’ve been collecting it for 10 years and it turns out it’s worth about as much as a chocolate fireguard. But hey, people are curious, etc.
Cas
Teapot. Sounds better.
Cheers
Kev
My output!
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no lwjgl64 in java.library.path
I don’t think this went as expected… lolz
You didn’t link the x64 natives