WebStart / Performance test

OpenGL Development JOGL Development
#41

[quote]Ken,

I’m a lot happier if this really is only a change for 1.6.0 by the way - even if this is regarded as a coding ‘bug’, it seems a major change for an _XX revision to the JVM.

Thanks again for your time on this.

Rob
[/quote]
Actually this bug only happens in 6.0. I’m the responsible engineer for this bug, and I think I know what the problem is. Basically I didn’t code the Log intrinsics the same way for both the interpreter and the compiler. Since the Log intrinsic is only 6.0, the fix will be 6.0 only as well

#42

Azeem,

Thanks for the update - nice to know that you are on the case.

Rob

#43

Hi Rob,

GeForce 3, Linux, AMD 2500+, 512M, latest drivers got me 83 fps.

#44

[quote]Azeem,

Thanks for the update - nice to know that you are on the case.

Rob
[/quote]
The bug is fixed, and should be in Java 6.0 build 19

#45

Gotta love those sneaky bugs in “minor” changes. Nice work anyway. :slight_smile:

As for the performance.
Dell Inspiron 9200 - 2.1GHz Centrino + Mobile ATI 9700 = 104fps with standard Dell drivers.

I guess the DNA and Omega drivers would improve this a little.

ps. what’s this about jdk 6.0, etc? :wink:

#46

Girvine (and Elam and others),

Thanks for the feedback figures.

Java 6.0 (Mustang) very early snapshot releases are available here:

https://j2se.dev.java.net/index.html

Rob

#47

I get about 120fps on my nVidia.

#48

Whoops, missed the build 19 cutoff, its in build 20 :slight_smile:

#49

Azeem,

Thanks - I’ll keep an eye out for it.

Rob

#50

Hi,

Not sure if you’re still looking for results, but I just ran it and get anywhere from 80-110 fps on athlon 3000+, geforce 4 ti something, fedora core 3…

#51

I got 136fps on my Athlon XP 3200+, Nvidia FX5700.

#52

emarcotte, Azeem,

Thanks for the feedback.

Azeem - you’re the winner of the ‘highest frame rate’ competition so far !

Rob

#53

WinXP SP1, nVidia GeForce 3 ti200

82fps