Allow me to try and clear up this confusion: The residency rule in the ToS is for my protection. Take this example (with a grain of salt, as I am not a lawyer):
Suppose you reside in the hypothetical land of Hyperbole. You go ahead an register anyway, clicking that you abide by the ToS, and play the game. Time passes. Later you discover some element of the game that breaks a law of Hyperbole, such as the Law Against Animated Depiction of Fantasy Combat (LAADFC). You want to sue me for breaking the law and causing damage to your psyche for exposing you to ADFC (an illegal act in Hyperbole). The ToS protect me from such suits, because I do not claim to abide by any such laws (that is, the laws to which you are subjected by your residency in Hyperbole).
I have no intent to break any laws of any nation, but I simply cannot guarantee it. Without the ToS, I would be exposed to all the laws of all the lands, which is an unfortunate reality of the business of gaming. I know a lot of folks are here just toying around (which is a great feature of the community, which I’ve much enjoyed), but some of us are actually having a go at running a business. Legal restrictions are a necessary evil.
That said, I appreciate community input on the subject. I’ve actually spent a lot of time/effort/money to make my ToS friendly to potential players. I certainly don’t desire to turn folks away.
Here’s what I will do: I will consult with the lawyer who drafted these terms, in order to assess the risk of changing this clause. No promises, but if I judge it to be acceptable, I will amend the ToS to stipulate, more clearly, something along the lines of: Any residency is acceptable, but only the laws of the USA are enforceable.
In the interim, I hope that even if (most respected) Riven takes offense, other members of this community will understand my situation.