log4j
hehe!
Cas 
I think the âsecrecyâ behind the JSR-134 related works was forced on the people involved by the JCP process and perhaps what various organizations invloved wanted to doâŚ
The fact that there are bits of code from LWJGL in JOAL proves that they didnât strictly care that it was NIH.
Just accept that the project has been opened up and has the support that is has from Sun.
[quote]I think the âsecrecyâ behind the JSR-134 related works was forced on the people involved by the JCP process and perhaps what various organizations invloved wanted to doâŚ
[/quote]
Does the JCP process enforce secrecy ??? - As for various organizations involved, thatâd be a bit of a change of mind then⌠first working in secrecy - and then totally going open source.
[quote] The fact that there are bits of code from LWJGL in JOAL proves that they didnât strictly care that it was NIH.
[/quote]
Ahh, but there is a huge difference (IMO) between being inspired, and actually supporting⌠- I mean, it didnât even fork any of the other possible projects
[quote] Just accept that the project has been opened up and has the support that is has from Sun.
[/quote]
And I do!! - I would even go so far as to say the I applaude it!
However, the way it has come about - combined with the intention of making this a âcommunity projectâ, leaves a lot to be desired.
But ofcourse, those that actually know how/what/when have yet to explainâŚ
[quote]log4j
hehe!
Cas
[/quote]
You win some (adding regexps, Collections), you lose some (forgetting List in JDK 1.1, log4j).