Interested to know how you were gonna fill up that Chrome OS app page?

Google Chrome - Can't Open jnlp (Java) files | PeteNetLive
Google Chrome - Unable to open Open jnlp (Java) files (they download instead)
Interested to know how you were gonna fill up that Chrome OS app page?
once again Google just re-invents the well using the powerness of their audience… ( they did not show O3D sample ? too bad this is sooo new ans sooo standard éh ? no ? )
someone please make another search engine fast ! Google please stop propaganda !!
wow… I am so negative today ^^ :-X
JWS is not really a technology “Web styled” and then absolutly useless, no more interrest than a standard executable jar file except that it really spam window " install / unsinstall "
umm, DzzD, for starters, they arent just reinventing something with the benifit of their audience. their re-inventing something sot aht it works just to be honest, the java store was crap. and the chrome store will better support java stuff,a nd other platforms as well.
I gotta go right now, but that is the general idea
Looks like the Chrome Web Store is live as a developer preview.
First person to get a Java game up there gets 10 JGO points 
Totally agree!
Also, Google will only take a 5% cut.
Are there any Java apps on there atm?
Someone pointed out that the Chrome Web Store is now open.
Already has some Java games on it e.g. Puzzle Pirates and RuneScape.
and you can add games that use Java Web Start ;D You only have to put the URL of your JNLP file into the manifest file:
"app": {
"urls": [
"${codebase-url}"
],
"launch": {
"web_url": "${codebase-url}/${tuer-jnlp-filename}"
}
},
Chrome web store shows potential for java indies. The only thing that bugs me, and that’s not minor, is this MS attitude now from Google: you have to use THEIR browser to use the store. Where are you going with Google? To yet another supremacy?
All my build system is based on Java Web Start. In the near future, I plan to build silly RPM and DEB packages that only contains a .desktop file (copied on the desktop with a post-installation script) that contains a command to launch the game with … Java Web Start. Using another installer is not a trivial change.
Chrome web store shows potential for java indies. The only thing that bugs me, and that’s not minor, is this MS attitude now from Google: you have to use THEIR browser to use the store. Where are you going with Google? To yet another supremacy?
You’re right, it is a bit stupid but then Google should not have called it Chrome Web Store.
Java Web Start does not work on Chrome Web Store because of this bug:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=10877
:’(
Java Web Start does not work on Chrome Web Store because of this bug:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=10877:’(
JWS has always been pretty buggy like that, many times the jnlp will just download or even open up as a text file in the browser, especially on linux.
As for Chrome not starting jnlp files but downloading them, its been like that for a long time, it might even be intentional. Also you’ll note that jnlp applets don’t work properly either on Chrome. So your alternatives are to use either a java applet (just the applet tag not jnlp) or something like Getdown if you want to launch desktop applications. Its really not that difficult to switch over from JWS.
[quote=“kapta,post:34,topic:35359”] Google Chrome - Unable to open Open jnlp (Java) files (they download instead)
It is not a bug of Java Web Start, it is a bug of Chrome. On Linux, when I open a JNLP file with Konqueror, Dolphin, Firefox, etc… it launches Java Web Start except in one case : when Chrome asks Konqueror to open the JNLP file. Therefore it is an intentional bug of Chrome, even this workaround does not work in my case:
PeteNetLive – 17 Nov 15

Google Chrome - Can't Open jnlp (Java) files | PeteNetLive
I have paid to be allowed to upload my application on Chrome Web Store, Google has to fix this bug as soon as possible, I won’t give up.
Edit.: it should be visible now:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/kdbbikdpnpikpmlfaadahcekdnkigona
Unfortunately I think it is difficult to find games that are not “featured”. When you register a game, you can only choose a the category “Games” and suggest additional categories by using tags but submitted games are not correctly sorted in the sub-categories that appear on this web store. For example, TUER could appear in “Arcade & Action”, it doesn’t. Therefore, the most visible games are in the “popular” and in the “featured” sections. It would be really better if we could at least put our games into these sub-categories because the “popular” sections in the “games” section contain all games…
Well if you must run TUER with java web start, one solution I can think of is running a small signed applet which starts the javaws executable with a url to the jnlp file.
Hi!
Well if you must run TUER with java web start, one solution I can think of is running a small signed applet which starts the javaws executable with a url to the jnlp file.
It is a good idea and I have enough info and permissions when executing a signed Java applet to do this.
I have found another solution: fixing this bug in Chrome/Chromium myself to help the whole Java community and I think it is there:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/net/base/mime_util.cc?view=markup
Java rocks ;D
Hi!
I have committed my fix for Chrome and Chromium but I have received a strange answer from one of the reviewers:
[quote]I’ll be considering this change from a security perspective. JNLP files can be
dangerous, so any changes here must be done carefully.
The first problem I think you’ll run into is that “JNLP” is on the “dangerous
file type” list.
[/quote]
Don’t worry, I will defend Java. I’m not Santa Claus but this bug fix would be a nice present for the whole community. I won’t give up. Google should not harm us and uses the security as an argument.
Well you can’t blame them, the recent driveby java hack that was publicised on most of the major tech news sites was a jnlp/javascript hack and because they don’t work on Chrome it wasn’t vulnerable.
But yeh overall the java sandbox has been a pretty good.